Judge Defends 1st Amendment

In Teter vs. Veritas trial the federal judge overruled all allegations that tried to hide from the public the voter and elections fraud made by DNC contractors in 2016. The tactics of the plaintiffs was a use of Teter unfortunate health condition as allegation that the interviews were damaging while vilifying the defendant and therefore the Jury would be sympathetic and in favor of a ruling that would hide the misconduct of HRC campaign including meddling and inciting confrontation in public places and assisting voter fraud and elections funding. The Judge defended the first amendment by debunking all the allegations of malice intent which can’t be proven or are not relevant to the journalistic role and conduct of the defendant.

“.. which I believe as to several of these are really no evidence of malice at all, are insufficient to meet that standard. Therefore, for that reason, the defendant’s motion — defendant’s motions pursuant to Rule 50 will be granted. “

https://www.projectveritas.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/teterdaythreetranscript.pdf